McCollum ex rel. McCollum v. United States
United States Court of Claims
The Reporters’ statement of the ease: The grounds of the motion sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtPeelle, J.
The question arises on the defendants’ motion for a new trial in a case wherein judgment was rendered on the Cth day of February, 1893, for $1,447.50 on the stipulation of the parties agreeing to accept the amount allowed by the Secretary of the Interior for a depredation committed by the defendant Indians iu the Territory, now State, of Oregon, October 23, 1855, as provided by section 4, act MarSh 3, 1891 (26 Stat. L., 851, and 1 Supp:E. S., 2d ed., p. 913). By the terms of that section it is provided that all allowed unpaid claims “shall have priority of consideration,” and further, that…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. AyresSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
- Leighton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1894
- Ex Parte: In the Matter of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
- Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
- United States v. CrusellSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.