Legal Opinion

McCollum ex rel. McCollum v. United States

United States Court of Claims

Decided May 31, 1898No. Indian Depredations, 8078Published

The Reporters’ statement of the ease: The grounds of the motion sufficiently appear in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtPeelle, J.

The question arises on the defendants’ motion for a new trial in a case wherein judgment was rendered on the Cth day of February, 1893, for $1,447.50 on the stipulation of the parties agreeing to accept the amount allowed by the Secretary of the Interior for a depredation committed by the defendant Indians iu the Territory, now State, of Oregon, October 23, 1855, as provided by section 4, act MarSh 3, 1891 (26 Stat. L., 851, and 1 Supp:E. S., 2d ed., p. 913). By the terms of that section it is provided that all allowed unpaid claims “shall have priority of consideration,” and further, that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. AyresSupreme Court of the United States · 1870
  2. Leighton v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1894
  3. Ex Parte: In the Matter of the United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1872
  4. Young v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  5. United States v. CrusellSupreme Court of the United States · 1871

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API