Moll v. Benckler
Wisconsin Supreme Court
APPEAL from tbe Circuit Court for Washington Comity. Tbe opinion states tbe case.
1Opinion of the CourtLyoN, J.
Tbe defendant, wbo was an overseer of highways, removed a fence by order of the supervisors of bis town, which bad been erected by the plaintiff on bis own premises, but in what is alleged to be a public highway. Tbe order of the town supervisors, which it is claimed constituted the locus in quo, a public highway, is as follows: “ Upon application of six or more freeholders, the supervisors of the above named town met and laid out a road, described as follows: commencing 80 rods south of the section line between sections 7 and 18, on the one-eighth line on the northeast quarter of section 18,…
2Cited by3 opinions
- Mahler v. BrumderWisconsin Supreme Court · 1896
- Schatz v. PfeilWisconsin Supreme Court · 1883
- State ex rel. Warden v. KnightWisconsin Supreme Court · 1892