State v. Zirfas
Missouri Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
TURNAGE, Judge.
Federal Insurance Company filed a petition for reparation under § 546.630, RSMo 1986,1 against Roger Zirfas and Eugene Elsrode. The court denied reparation and Federal has appealed. The question to be resolved is whether or not a suspended imposition of sentence is a conviction within the meaning of that term as used in § 546.630. Affirmed.
Zirfas and Elsrode were charged with felony stealing, § 570.030. The two entered pleas of guilty and the court suspended imposition of sentence and placed each on probation for a period of five years.
The stealing occurred when Zirfas and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. . FabianNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
- State v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- State v. ActonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
- Meyer v. Missouri Real Estate CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944
- Warren v. Director, Missouri Division of HealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Yale v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
- United States v. SolomonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1993