Legal Opinion

State v. Zirfas

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided December 3, 1991No. Nos. WD 44285, WD 44286PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TURNAGE, Judge.

Federal Insurance Company filed a petition for reparation under § 546.630, RSMo 1986,1 against Roger Zirfas and Eugene Elsrode. The court denied reparation and Federal has appealed. The question to be resolved is whether or not a suspended imposition of sentence is a conviction within the meaning of that term as used in § 546.630. Affirmed.

Zirfas and Elsrode were charged with felony stealing, § 570.030. The two entered pleas of guilty and the court suspended imposition of sentence and placed each on probation for a period of five years.

The stealing occurred when Zirfas and…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. People v. . FabianNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. State v. LynchSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  3. State v. ActonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1984
  4. Meyer v. Missouri Real Estate CommissionMissouri Court of Appeals · 1944
  5. Warren v. Director, Missouri Division of HealthMissouri Court of Appeals · 1978

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Yale v. City of IndependenceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1993
  2. United States v. SolomonDistrict Court, E.D. Missouri · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API