Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Robinson v. City and County of Denver

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided August 17, 2000No. 98CA2566Published

1Concurrence

Judge DAVIDSON

specially concurring.

Most civil litigation is outrageously costly. And, if an appellate court finds instructional "plain error," the usual remedy is a new trial. Thus, the paradoxical result of "doing equity" in such cases is that the non-erring party bears the expensive burden of his or her opponent's errors. In my view, if an instructional error is such that it would constitute a miscarriage of justice sufficiently egregious to constitute plain error, then the more appropriate remedy is a legal malpractice action. The inevitable damage award to the erring attorney's client…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bear Valley Church of Christ v. DeBoseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1996
  2. Mar Oil, S.A., Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Francis X. Morrissey, Jr., Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1993
  3. Northeast Women's Center, Inc. v. McMonagleCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API