Legal Opinion
Satlof v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia
Decided December 6, 1935No. 25114PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtBroyles, C. J.
1. “A démurrer to the original' petition does not cover the petition after it has been materially amended. Powell v. Cheshire, 70 Ga. 357 (2 b) (48 Am. R. 572). If the demurrer is still relied on, it should be renewed or insisted upon after the amendment has been allowed.” General Accident &c. Cor. v. Way, 20 Ga. App. 106 (2) (92 S. E. 650). In the instant case the demurrers to the original petition were not renewed or insisted on after the petition was amended materially; and after allowance of the amendment. the judge passed an order overruling the demurrers to the original petition only.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Gillespie v. Mayor of MaconCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1916
- Powell v. CheshireSupreme Court of Georgia · 1883
- Doe ex dem. Summerlin v. RoeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1856
- General Accident, Fire & Life Assurance Corp. v. WayCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1917
3Cited by6 opinions
- Atlanta Paper Co. v. SigmonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1950
- Pollock v. City of AlbanyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1953
- Edwards v. LassiterCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
- National Surety Corporation v. HuntCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
- Moon v. Atlas Auto Finance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1960
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.