Legal Opinion

Austin and Laurato, P.A. v. United States

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

Decided September 24, 2013No. 13-10440UnpublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Per curiam

Two law firms, Austin and Laurato, P.A. and Sisco-Law, P.A. (collectively, “the Firms”) appeal from the district court’s order dismissing their wrongful levy civil action against the United States for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The district court concluded sua sponte that the Firms lacked Article III standing, and also agreed with the government that dismissal was warranted because the Firms failed to bring their wrongful levy action within the nine month limitations period prescribed by Congress in 26 U.S.C. § 6582(c). The district court further denied as futile the Firms’ request…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  2. Sierra Club v. MortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Aquilino v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. Charles Dowd Box Co. v. CourtneySupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  5. Cockrell v. SparksCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2007

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Goodrich v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2021
  2. Austin & Laurato, P.A. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2014
  3. Benchmark Consulting, Inc v. USAA Casualty Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2020
  4. Daniel Reeves v. United States of America et al.District Court, S.D. Georgia · 2025
  5. Hyped Holdings, LLC v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2023

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API