Legal Opinion

Schuster v. Bowen

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 26, 1950No. Civ. 4018Published

1Opinion of the Court

SHEPARD, J. pro tem.

Action to recover money paid to defendant by cheek signed in blank and filled in by defendant. Defendant, in the years 1945 and 1946, acted as employee, manager, joint operator and financial supporter of certain farm properties of plaintiff. Plaintiff at various times became indebted to defendant for unpaid wages, money advanced by defendant to plaintiff for farm operations of plaintiff, money loaned, crop shares, and farm machinery belonging to defendant and sold by plaintiff for his own account. Partial payments were made from time to time but a complete and final…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Davidson v. LanierSupreme Court of the United States · 1867
  2. Wilson v. BaileyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Estate of GillettCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946
  4. Morrison v. J. D. WillhoitCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  5. Smith v. LagerstromCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API