Legal Opinion

Reeves v. Liberty Mut. Ins.

District Court, N.D. Texas

Decided August 9, 1943No. Nos. 185, 186PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ATWELL, District Judge.

Plaintiffs were employees of Jones & Brooks, and were engaged in laying a pipe-line in the northern part of Clay Coun*773ty, Texas. Each claims that his work begun at 8 o’clock in the morning and continued to 5 o’clock in the afternoon. That they had no method of transporting themselves for the twelve or fifteen miles necessary to reach their work each morning, and it was a part of their contract with their employers that they would be transported from a certain point on Highway No. 82, each morning, to the place of work for that particular day. That it was provided that…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
  2. Smith v. Texas Employers' InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  3. Safety Casualty Co. v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1942
  4. American Indemnity Co. v. DinkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
  5. London Guaranty & Accident Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Povia Bros. Farms v. VelezSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
  2. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
  3. United States Fidelity And Guaranty Co. v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API