Reeves v. Liberty Mut. Ins.
District Court, N.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
ATWELL, District Judge.
Plaintiffs were employees of Jones & Brooks, and were engaged in laying a pipe-line in the northern part of Clay Coun*773ty, Texas. Each claims that his work begun at 8 o’clock in the morning and continued to 5 o’clock in the afternoon. That they had no method of transporting themselves for the twelve or fifteen miles necessary to reach their work each morning, and it was a part of their contract with their employers that they would be transported from a certain point on Highway No. 82, each morning, to the place of work for that particular day. That it was provided that…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Lumberman's Reciprocal Ass'n. v. BehnkenTexas Supreme Court · 1922
- Smith v. Texas Employers' InsuranceTexas Supreme Court · 1937
- Safety Casualty Co. v. WrightTexas Supreme Court · 1942
- American Indemnity Co. v. DinkinsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919
- London Guaranty & Accident Co. v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1926
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Povia Bros. Farms v. VelezSupreme Court of Florida · 1954
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954
- United States Fidelity And Guaranty Co. v. DonovanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1954