Legal Opinion

United States v. John Hoyt Curtis

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 8, 1993No. 92-30235Published

1Opinion of the Court

DAVID ALAN EZRA, District Judge:

John Hoyt Curtis appeals his conviction for discharging a pollutant into the surface waters of the United States in violation of the Clean Water Act (“CWA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311(a), 1319(c)(2)(A). He argues that the CWA does not apply to federal employees whose alleged violations occurred in the course of their employment. We reject the argument. Since Curtis is a “person” subject to the enforcement provisions of the CWA as defined in 33 U.S.C. §§ 1319(c)(6), 1362(5), we affirm.

I.FACTS

John Hoyt Curtis was Fuels Division Director at Adak Naval Air Station in…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. O'Shea v. LittletonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  2. Butz v. EconomouSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Pyramid Lake Paiute Tribe of Indians v. United States Department of the Navy James Webb, as Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  4. In Re Jon Robert Perroton, Debtor. Jon Robert Perroton v. Nancy L.G. GrayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
  5. United States v. Michael Lee DahmsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API