Legal Opinion

Happy v. Erwin

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided December 18, 1959PublishedCited by 42 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CLAY, Commissioner.

Separate actions were filed by plaintiff appellants to recover damages arising out of a motor vehicle accident, and the cases have been consolidated on appeal. Appel-lee defendants in the suits were H. L. Erwin, the operator of a fire truck owned by the City of Mayfield, the City of May-field, the City of Murray, and the liability insurance carriers of the two cities. Upon proper motions the trial court dismissed the complaints as to all defendants.

The substance of plaintiffs’ contentions on these appeals is that they should be permitted to prove their causes of action…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ludwig v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1932
  2. Chambers v. Ideal Pure Milk Co.Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1952
  3. City of Louisville v. BridwellCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  4. Smith v. City of LexingtonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1957

3Cited by42 opinions

  1. Withers v. University of KentuckyKentucky Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Williams v. WilsonKentucky Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Fann v. McGuffeyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1975
  4. Kentucky Center for the Arts Corp. v. BernsKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Perkins v. Northeastern Log HomesKentucky Supreme Court · 1991

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API