Alishio v. Department of Social & Health Services
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtGrosse, J.
Collateral estoppel does not prohibit a party from asserting an issue that was not decided in an earlier proceeding. Since Alishio and the Department of Social and Health Services (DSHS) agreed to an order of dependency based on a ground other than neglect, the issue of whether Delaura Whitson Alishio neglected her son was not decided in a dependency proceeding. Because the issue of neglect was not decided in the dependency proceeding, DSHS is not collaterally estopped to assert neglect in a later administrative hearing.
FACTS
In June 2000, DSHS notified Alishio that it had received reports and…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Tapper v. Employment Security DepartmentWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Waste Management of Seattle, Inc. v. Utilities & Transportation CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1994
- Hanson v. City of SnohomishWashington Supreme Court · 1993
- Seattle-First National Bank v. KawachiWashington Supreme Court · 1978
- Aponte v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1998
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Thurston County v. Western Washington Growth Management Hearings BoardCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2007
- Alishio v. DEPT. OF SOC. & HEALTH SERV.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Alishio v. Department of Social & Health ServicesCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Onshore Quality Control Specialists LLC v. BromleyDistrict Court, E.D. Washington · 2025