Barringer v. Ryder
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Palo Alto District Gourt. — Hon. A. D. Bailie, Judge. Action to set aside a deed for want of consideration, ;and for fraud in its procurement. Judgment for the plaintiff. The defendants appeal. —
1Opinion of the CourtSherwin, J.
*122r surety: inthMpereon: sideration*for deed' *121The defendant F. E. Ryder was surety on past due notes given by two of the plaintiff’s sons to a bank in Ruinven. He alleges in his answer that he entered into an agreement with the plaintiff whereby he was to either pay thos i notes, or to substitute his individual note therefor, in consideration of which she was to secure him for so doing by a conveyance to him of the land in question, and that it was deeded to him pursuant to such agreement, and after he had executed his individual note *122to the bank in place of the ones upon which he was a surety…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Ayres v. C., R. I. & P. R.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1879
- Epperly v. FergusonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
- Bean v. BriggsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1857
- Gilliland v. InabnitSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894
- Davis v. Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1891
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sullivan ex rel. Orton v. KenneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
- Tansil v. McCumberSupreme Court of Iowa · 1925
- Bradford v. SmithSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Titus Management Co. v. KelseySupreme Court of Iowa · 1936
- Whalen v. RingSupreme Court of Iowa · 1937
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.