Legal Opinion
Miller v. McKenna
California Supreme Court
Decided March 20, 1944No. L. A. 18157Published
1Opinion of the Court
23 Cal.2d 774 (1944)
EDWIN J. MILLER, Appellant,
v.
CATHERINE A. McKENNA et al., Defendants; DANIEL B. FLENNER et al., Respondents.
L. A. No. 18157.
Supreme Court of California. In Bank.
Mar. 20, 1944.
Edwin J. Miller, in pro. per., and Ralph W. Miller for Appellant.
W. Verne Ahrens, Ernest M. Best, Ratzer & Bridge and Glenn A. Lane for Respondents.
Robert W. Kenny, Attorney General, H. H. Linney, Assistant Attorney General, Adrian A. Kragen and John L. Nourse, Deputies Attorney General, J. H. O'Connor, County Counsel, and A. Curtis Smith, Deputy County Counsel, as Amici Curiae on behalf of…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited83 opinions
- Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Graham & Foster v. GoodcellSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- TERRETT & OTHERS v. Taylor & OthersSupreme Court of the United States · 1815
- Swayne & Hoyt, Ltd. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- United States v. Heinszen & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1907
78 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.