Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Jeffrey K.

Nebraska Court of Appeals

Decided June 27, 2006No. A-05-1033Published

1DissentCarlson, Judge

The majority concludes that the record fails to show that Jeffrey intended to intimidate the victim, given that Jeffrey called the victim names, threw food at her, and on at least one occasion pushed a chair toward her for his own juvenile amusement. I disagree. The fact that Jeffrey found his behavior amusing does not justify the conclusion that Jeffrey did not intend to intimidate the victim. Rather, Jeffrey’s words and actions, the extensive nature of Jeffrey’s conduct, and the victim’s reactions to Jeffrey’s behavior all clearly show that Jeffrey intended to intimidate the victim.

At…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Anthony P.Nebraska Court of Appeals · 2005
  2. State v. PetersonNebraska Supreme Court · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API