Legal Opinion

In Re the Marriage of Ginsberg

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided May 16, 2008No. 06-0615PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Tanya and John Ginsberg ended their marriage in 2004. Their dissolution decree ordered John to pay the debt the parties owed to Tanya’s father and hold Tanya harmless from any liability. Because the parties could not agree on how much was owed, the decree stated the amount of the debt was “disputed.” John did not repay Tanya’s father. Tanya eventually repaid the loan herself and brought this action seeking indemnification from John under the terms of the decree. The district court ordered John to pay Tanya $121,000. John appealed. The court of appeals held claim preclusion barred Tanya’s…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. DeVoss v. StateSupreme Court of Iowa · 2002
  2. Penn v. Iowa State Board of RegentsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1998
  3. Shumaker v. Iowa Department of TransportationSupreme Court of Iowa · 1995
  4. Mineke v. FoxSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  5. Sorensen v. NelsonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1984

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State of Iowa v. Terran E. RoacheSupreme Court of Iowa · 2018
  2. Anchor Bay II Owner's Assoc. v. WOHLOA, Inc.Court of Appeals of Iowa · 2024
  3. Raymond Sullins v. Iowa District Court for Polk County, and City of Des Moines and Safari II, L.L.C., InterveningCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2017
  4. State of Iowa v. John DoeCourt of Appeals of Iowa · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API