Tucson Telco Federal Credit Union v. Bowser
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.
The right to appeal exists only by force of statute and therefore this court must pass upon its jurisdiction to consider an appeal. Howard P. Foley Co. v. Harris, 4 Ariz. App. 294, 419 P.2d 735 (1966) and cases cited therein. Examination of the record of the proceedings in the court below leads us to conclude that this appeal is premature.
Briefly, this litigation took the following course. The Bowsers, plaintiffs below, filed suit for damages for the allegedly wrongful repossession of their car by Tucson Telco. (Tucson Telco held the note and chattel mortgage.) Tucson…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Howard P. Foley Company v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
3Cited by6 opinions
- Musa v. C. K. Adrian, M. D.Arizona Supreme Court · 1981
- Bates v. Superior Court, Maricopa CountyArizona Supreme Court · 1988
- Cook v. CookCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1976
- Empress Beauty Supply, Inc. v. PriceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Wyatt v. Ruck Construction Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.