Legal Opinion · Dissent

Mancini v. Kaminski

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided June 1, 1979Published

1DissentDillon, P. J.

I dissent. The parties are adjoining lot owners in the City of Utica. The uncontradicted evidence demonstrates beyond doubt that all of the reconstructed piers or footings supporting the posts to which defendants’ fence is connected encroach upon plaintiffs property. The tops of all footings are beneath the surface of the earth and each footing extends *1046into plaintiffs property, the range of which is from 0.60 feet for one to 1.11 feet for another. Plaintiff discovered the encroachments during the construction of the footings and made immediate objection to the defendants. Upon dismissing the…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Butler v. . Frontier Telephone Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1906
  2. Andrews v. . CohenNew York Court of Appeals · 1917
  3. Crocker v. Manhattan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1901
  4. 116 East 57th Street, Inc. v. GouldAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1948
  5. St. Vincent's Orphan Asylum v. Madison-Warren Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1929

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API