Legal Opinion

Hart v. Randolph

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided November 2, 1892PublishedCited by 12 opinions

Writ of Error to the Circuit Court of Coles county; the Hon. James T. Hughes, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Baker

The substance of the bill of complaint of Vienna Hart, plaintiff in error, is, that she is the widow of Thomas Hart, who died on the 25th day of May, 1881; that said Thomas was the owner in fee simple of lots 5 and 6, in block 176, in the city of Mattoon, Illinois, and on the 25th day of January, 1869, mortgaged them to one Samuel Neff, to secure a promissory note for $1000, given for borrowed money; that after-wards the said Thomas made and delivered to the said Neff a quit-claim deed for the premises, bearing date May 17, 1869, which deed was in fact a mortgage to secure said loan, and that…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dickie v. CarterIllinois Supreme Court · 1866
  2. Irving v. BrownellIllinois Supreme Court · 1849
  3. Owen v. PeacockIllinois Supreme Court · 1865
  4. Gove v. CatherIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
  5. Holbrook v. DickensonIllinois Supreme Court · 1870

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Cain v. EhrlerSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Sargent v. HamblinNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Citizens Bank v. MeyerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1921
  4. Robertson v. BachmannIllinois Supreme Court · 1933
  5. Bowen v. OlsonUtah Supreme Court · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API