Dietz v. Chandler

On this appeal, no assignments of error, eo nomine, was filed. There was filed by original counsel for appellant a one and one-third page “brief” attacking the validity of the judgment in general terms on the ground that it was not supported by the evidence or, at least, was contrary to the manifest weight of the evidence, and specifically that there was no evidence of joint enterprise upon which the liability of the appellant, Albert L. Chandler, depends, and perhaps one other assignment, as hereinafter noted.

Succeeding counsel for appellant in oral argument sought to raise the issue of…