Rothstein v. Honeywell, Inc.
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
BASKIN, Judge.
Appellant Rothstein seeks review of a final summary judgment limiting appellee Honeywell’s liability as to damages awarded Rothstein for Honeywell’s failure to install a burglar alarm system in Rothstein’s home in accordance with the terms of the parties’ contract. Honeywell cross-appeals an interlocutory order denying its motion for summary judgment on the initial complaint, and in the event the final judgment under review is reversed, seeks relitigation of all issues. We reverse.
After a burglary occurred at her home, Rothstein contacted Honeywell and entered a contract with…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Holl v. TalcottSupreme Court of Florida · 1966
- Moore v. MorrisSupreme Court of Florida · 1985
- Jaar v. University of MiamiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
- Levey v. GetelmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Richards v. WaxDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- ADT Security Services, Inc. v. SwensonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 2011
- Illinois Ins. Exchange v. SCOTTSDALE INS.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996