Legal Opinion

319 East 72nd Street Corp. v. George W. Warnecke & Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 3, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Memorandum by the court.

Judgment entered on July 2, 1963 affirmed, on the law and on the facts, with costs. Appellant points to nothing in the testimony or in law sufficient to impugn the well-considered and comprehensive opinion of the trial court or the propriety of the remedy ordered. Deceit, it is plain, corrupted Warnecke’s course from the outset. Espying an opportunity to gain the property for himself, and a substantial brokerage fee in the bargain, and to himself construct the building plaintiffs had planned to erect, he misled plaintiffs into believing he had fruitlessly approached…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Meinhard v. SalmonNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
  2. American Sugar Refining Co. v. FancherNew York Court of Appeals · 1895
  3. Fur & Wool Trading Co. v. George I. Fox, Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1927
  4. Falk v. . HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1922
  5. Katzman v. Ætna Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1955

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Edwards v. HauffCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Securities Groups v. Atkins (In Re Securities Groups)United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida · 1988
  3. Barnett v. Securities Groups (In re Monetary Group)District Court, M.D. Florida · 1990
  4. Grubbs v. GrubbsVirginia Circuit Court · 1977

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API