Vail National Bank v. Finkelman
Colorado Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Judge TURSI.
Sol Finkelman, defendant and maker of a check, appeals a judgment in favor of Vail National Bank awarding it recovery on the check. He contends that the trial court erred in failing to rule, as a matter of law, that the knowledge of the majority shareholder and director of the bank was imputed knowledge of the bank and that, therefore, it was not a holder in due course or, alternatively, in refusing to tender an instruction to the jury regarding the issue of imputed notice. We affirm.
During the pertinent time period, Joseph Penner was the majority shareholder of the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- American Nat. Bank of Nashville v. MillerSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Hamilton v. HardyColorado Court of Appeals · 1976
- Kopeikin v. Merchants Mortgage & Trust Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Anderson v. General American Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1944
- Ackmann v. Merchants Mortgage & Trust Corp.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1983
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Official Committee of Unsecured Creditors v. R.F. Lafferty & Co., Inc. Cogen Sklar, L.L.PCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2001
- Sender v. MannDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2006
- Golden Door Jewelry Creations, Inc. v. Lloyds Underwriters Non-Marine Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1997
- Park Rise Homeowners Ass'n v. Resource Construction Co.Colorado Court of Appeals · 2006
- In Re Stat-Tech Securities LitigationDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.