Wilson v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.
Appellate Court of Illinois
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Maag
The plaintiff, Ronald Wilson, filed a complaint pursuant to the Federal Employer’s Liability Act (the Act) (45 U.S.C.A. § 51 et seq. (West 1986)), seeking to recover damages from defendant, Norfolk and Western Railway Company. Plaintiff alleged that defendant intentionally inflicted emotional distress upon him during the course of his employment with defendant. Defendant moved for summary judgment on plaintiff’s complaint, claiming that since plaintiff had not suffered a physical contact or the threat of a physical contact as a result of its alleged actions, it was not liable to the…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. GottshallSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- McGrath v. FaheyIllinois Supreme Court · 1988
- Doe v. Calumet CityIllinois Supreme Court · 1994
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Wilson v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
- Wilson v. Norfolk & Western Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999
- Wilson v. Norfolk & Western Ry. Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1999