Griffith v. Drew's LLC
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
Nebraska Advance Sheets 508 290 NEBRASKA REPORTS The entire amount of Valpak’s payments to Direct Marketing was taxable under § 056.05A, because those payments consti- tuted purchases of labor and, in some cases, creative talent for work on advertising materials. The regulation speaks of taxes generally and does not differentiate between sales and use taxes. See id. However, it is well established that if an “item is purchased in Nebraska, the sales tax applies. If the item is pur- chased outside of Nebraska, the use tax applies.” See Interstate Printing Co. v. Department of Revenue, 236 Neb.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Interstate Printing Co. v. Department of RevenueNebraska Supreme Court · 1990
- Newton v. BrownNebraska Supreme Court · 1986
- Streeks, Inc. v. Diamond Hill Farms, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 2000
- Frost v. SchinkelNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.