Legal Opinion

Hicks v. Barnes.

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 17, 1903PublishedCited by 8 opinions

ActioN by Bruce Hicks against A. T. Barnes, heard by Judge Francis D. Winston and a jury, at September Term, 1902, of the Superior Court of Vance County. From a judgment for the plaintiff, the defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

This action was begun before a justice of the peace for the recovery of $195 and interest from February, 1895. The plaintiff alleged that he entered into the service of the defendant during the month of February, 1895 and continued therein until February, 1898; that his services were reasonably worth $7.50 per month; that he never received any compensation “except a very scanty supply of clothing” during the period of service, and his food and lodg ing; and that he was a minor, reaching his majority on the 23d day of February, 1902.

The defendant denied being indebted to plaintiff. The case…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dodson v. . McAdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  2. Young v. . HermanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1887
  3. Callahan v. . WoodSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1896
  4. Hudson v. . LutzSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1857
  5. Avitt v. . SmithSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Winkler v. Killian.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  2. Bolling v. Bolling's Admr.Court of Appeals of Kentucky · 1912
  3. Dorsett v. . DorsettSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1922
  4. Dunn v. Currie.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1906
  5. Stallings v. Ellis.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API