MATTER OF PERRY v. Town of Cherry Valley
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentVan Voorhis, J.
Notwithstanding that the deceased town superintendent of highways of the Town of Cherry Valley was in good faith using the town’s blasting equipment for the improvement of private property in consideration of payment by the property owner to the town, such an operation was beyond his powers as a public officer and illegal (Highway Law, *431§§ 140, 142, 142-b, 142-c, 142-d; Matter of Niland v. Bowron, 193 N. Y. 180; Smith v. City of Rochester, 76 N. Y. 506, 509; Smith v. Smythe, 197 N. Y. 457; 2 Op. St. Comptroller, 1946, p. 43; 3 Op. St. Comptroller, 1947, pp. 234, 235; 4 Op. St. Comptroller,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Messersmith v. . American Fidelity Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Matter of Heitz v. . RuppertNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Augustine v. Town of BrantNew York Court of Appeals · 1928
- Village of Fort Edward v. . FishNew York Court of Appeals · 1898
- Wells v. . Town of SalinaNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.