Legal Opinion

Paul L. & Louise Monroe's Guardian v. Monroe

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided June 25, 1926PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the 'Court by

Judge Dietzman

Affirming.

This action was brought by appellee against his two infant 'children, Paul L. Monroe and Louise Monroe, who are nineteen and sixteen years old respectively, to reform a deed. In 1922 the appellee traded some property he owned in Barren county, where he was then living, for the property which is the 'Subject matter of this action and which is located in Nelson county. It is overwhelmingly established, indeed without dispute, that through a mistake of the draftsman who wrote the deed in Nelson county and sent it to Monroe in Barren county, Monroe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Payton v. McQuownCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1895
  2. Crume v. ShermanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1919
  3. Stuart v. PetrieCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1910
  4. American Agricultural Chemical Co. v. McKinneyCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
  5. Norman v. NormanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1869

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Divine v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1930
  2. Burke v. TartarCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1961
  3. United States v. WatasheCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1939
  4. Kentucky Home Life Ins. Co. v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1935
  5. Shanks, Auditor v. Northcutt, Ex-SheriffCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API