Mary D. Branch v. Officer Timothy Gorman
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
BYE, Circuit Judge.
Mary D. Branch filed this action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 and Minnesota state law claiming officers of the Minneapolis Police Department violated her Constitutional rights when they arrested her. The district court 1 granted summary judgment for defendants on the federal constitutional claims and dismissed the Minnesota state law claims. Branch appeals, arguing she proffered sufficient evidence to show the defendant officer violated her clearly established rights. We affirm.
I
Pursuant to the proper standard of review, described below, the following are the facts as most…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Brian Ulrich v. Pope CountyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Borgman v. KedleyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- State v. FlorineSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1975
- Cynthia Clayborn v. Dennis StrueblingCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Michael Seiser v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2014
- Berwanger v. KabergDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2023
- Farmer v. Kansas City, Missouri, Board of Police CommissionersDistrict Court, W.D. Missouri · 2022
- Gall v. EhrismanDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2023
- Griffin v. HollisDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 2019
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.