McBride v. State
Alabama Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the CourtFoster, J.
Appellant was convicted in the county court for “peddling medicine without license.” The complaint in that court was based upon Schedule 80 of Licenses as it appears in the Acts of Alabama 1919, p. 425, which requires that “peddlers of'medicine” shall pay a license of $100 in each county in which they peddle. ,
On appeal to the circuit court an information was filed, which, as last amended, charged the constituent elements of Schedule 81 of Licenses as it appears in Acts 1919, p. 426, that the defendant “did offer for sale drugs, etc., and by speech, writing, etc., profess to cure or treat…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Tatum v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Echols v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1917
- Gandy v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1886
- Haley v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1879
- Perry v. StateSupreme Court of Alabama · 1884
3Cited by3 opinions
- Dunning v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1926
- Mattison v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1954
- Melton v. StateAlabama Court of Appeals · 1929