Legal Opinion

Nelson v. Becker

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 15, 1875PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error from Butler District Court. All the facts of this case are set forth in the opinion. Becker had judgment at the February Term 1873 of the district court, and Nelson brings the case here on error.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Valentine, J.:

The principal if not the only question involved in this case, is, whether a judgment of a justice of the peace rendered upon a service of summons made only two days prior to the time of rendering such judgment is to be deemed valid and binding, when attacked collaterally, or whether such a judgment must be deemed void in all cases. We think that such a judgment is never void, but only voidable, and must be held valid and binding in all cases until reversed, vacated, or set aside by some direct proceeding instituted for that purpose. It is…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Ballinger v. TarbellSupreme Court of Iowa · 1864
  2. Doyle v. StateOhio Supreme Court · 1848
  3. Armstrong v. GrantSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871
  4. Claypoole v. HoustonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1873
  5. Dutton v. HobsonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1871

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Leonard v. SparksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1893
  2. Gross v. FunkSupreme Court of Kansas · 1878
  3. Burns v. Pittsburg Mortgage Investment Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1924
  4. Southwestern Surety Ins. Co. v. DietrichSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1918
  5. Dallam County Bank v. BurnsideNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1926

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API