Legal Opinion
State v. Berger
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided February 28, 1992No. 2 CA-CR 90-0143PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FERNANDEZ, Presiding Judge.
After a hearing held pursuant to Rule 11, Ariz.R.Crim. P., 17 A.R.S., the trial court found appellant incompetent to stand trial but with a substantial probability that his competency could be restored. Appellant was ordered to be transported to the Maricopa County Jail Mental Health Unit for a period not to exceed 150 days. He was subsequently returned to Pima County and found guilty of three criminal counts. On *119appeal, appellant contends that the court erred in 1) not holding a hearing to determine his competency following his return to Pima County, 2)…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dusky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Drope v. MissouriSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. Amaya-RuizArizona Supreme Court · 1990
- Szoke v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- State v. LaGrandArizona Supreme Court · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- State of Arizona v. Robert Charles GlissendorfCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2013
- State of Arizona v. Curtis T. BuntonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2012