Legal Opinion

In Re Horton

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided September 23, 1949PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This is an action by the executors of Mary Esther Horton, also known as Etta H. Horton and Etta Horton, deceased, for a construction of her will. The defendants are nephews and nieces, grandnephews and grandnieces, by consanguinity and by affinity. None of the defendants answered the complaint. They contented themselves with the filing of briefs discussing the legal aspects of the case.

The decedent, Mary Esther Horton, died a resident of Bergen County, on April 24, 1948, leaving surviving four nephews and nieces and eight grandnephews and grandnieces of her own blood; three nephews and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Noice v. SchnellSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1927
  2. Fidelity Union Trust Co. v. NollNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1939
  3. Garabrant v. CallawaySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1933
  4. Saving Investment & Trust Co. v. CrouchNew Jersey Court of Chancery · 1922

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Camden Trust Co. v. Christ's Home of WarminsterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1953
  2. In Re Estate of FabianCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997
  3. In Re Estate of AngeleriDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1991
  4. Carr v. DunnSupreme Court of Alabama · 1980
  5. Fender v. FenderCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1997

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API