Legal Opinion

Brennan v. O'Driscoll

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided January 15, 1863PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Error to Buchanan Common Pleas Court. In this case are interpicas by Bridgett Ann O’Driscoll, by Bartholomew O’Driscoll and Elizabeth O’Driscoll, his wife, in right of the wife, and Bartholomew O’Driscoll, claiming to be administrator of Eliza O’Driscoll, deceased.

1Opinion of the CourtBates, Judge

This is a strange record. The clerk of the court below has consolidated his entries so as to produce great confusion.

Brennan sued Bartholomew O’Driscoll by attachment, and a negro slave was seized by the sheriff as the property of Bartholomew O’Driseoll.

Bridgett Ann O’Driscoll filed an interplea, claiming the slave. Bartholomew O’Driscoll and his wife filed another interplea, claiming the slave as the property of the wife ; and Bartholomew O’Driscoll, as administrator of Eliza O’Driscoll, filed another interplea, claiming the slave as belonging to him as administrator of the estate of Eliza…

2Cited by3 opinions

  1. Wolff v. VetteMissouri Court of Appeals · 1885
  2. Giett v. McGannon Mercantile Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1898
  3. Kirschenschlager v. Armitage Herschel Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1894

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API