Legal Opinion
United States v. Ailemen
District Court, N.D. California
Decided December 30, 2008No. C-04-0823 RMW, CR-94-0003PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING PETITIONER’S 28 U.S.C. § 2255 MOTION, DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND DENYING PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR REFERRAL
RONALD M. WHYTE, District Judge.
Petitioner Pius Ailemen (“petitioner” or “defendant”) brings this action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate, set aside, or correct his federal criminal conviction and sentence. Petitioner also filed a motion for partial summary judgment, to which the United States government (“respondent”) objected on the grounds that the motion violated this court’s August 15, 2007 order. Most recently, petitioner filed a motion…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Jones v. BarnesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Liteky v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kimmelman v. MorrisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ingram v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2014
- El-Hage v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2019