Legal Opinion

Nash v. Hamilton

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided January 5, 1918PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal : Court of Appeals for Franklin county.

1Opinion of the CourtAllread, J.

This cause involves a construction, of the following clause of the will of Mary Maxon Nash :

“To my sister Darien C. Hamilton, wife of F. W. Hamilton, I give and devise the following property: * * *
*67“(c) $2,000.00 of the first mortgage bonds of The Gallipolis Gas & Electric Company, said bonds being secured by mortgage upon both the gas and electric plants.”

At the time of the execution of said will the testatrix owned four first-mortgage bonds of the par value of $2,000, issued by The Gallipolis Gas & Coke Company, which operated a gas and electric' plant in said city, and which were evidently…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Kenaday v. SinnottSupreme Court of the United States · 1901

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Cuppett v. NeillyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Hastings College v. ReesNebraska Supreme Court · 1947
  3. Estate of Parks v. HodgeOhio Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. In Re M. Brett Cooper, M.D. v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 15th District2025
  5. In re Estate of KirkwoodCuyahoga County Probate Court · 1965

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API