Legal Opinion

CONTINENTAL MORTGAGE v. Quail Run Assocs.

Court of Appeals of South Carolina

Decided January 23, 1984No. 0051PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cureton, Judge:

This case arises out of a mortgage foreclosure action affecting real and personal property located on Hilton Head Island, South Carolina. Continental Mortgage Investors (CMI) seeks a foreclosure judgment based on various alleged defaults under the terms of several notes, mortgages and loan agreements. Quail Run Associates (QRA) counterclaimed alleging a prior breach of the Sound Modification of Loan Agreement (Second Agreement) and seeks actual damages or, alternatively, a set-off against the monies it owes CMI.

The case was heard before a special referee who recommended…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Townes Associates, Ltd. v. City of GreenvilleSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1976
  2. Whitt v. GodwinSupreme Court of Virginia · 1965
  3. Collier v. GreenSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1964
  4. Propst Construction Co. v. North Carolina Department of TransportationCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
  5. Satcher v. Woodmen of the World Life Ins. Soc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Fibkins v. FibkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1991
  2. Orphan Aid Society v. JenkinsCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1987
  3. Caulder v. LewisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1986
  4. Advance International, Inc. v. North Carolina National BankCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1994
  5. Alexander v. WaldenCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1985

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API