Legal Opinion
Karfiol v. Rothner
U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York
Decided February 9, 1907PublishedCited by 2 opinions
In Equity. Suit for infringement of patents. On motion for preliminary injunction.
1Opinion of the Court
CHATFIELD, District Judge.
The defendants are alleged to he using patents Nos. 835,189, for method of perforating or dividing paper, 835,190, for machinery for cutting or dividing paper, and 835,283, for apparatus for perforating or dividing paper or other sheet material— all dated November 6, 1906, and issued to B. Karfiol, which patents the complainant claims are valid. By such alleged use, it is claimed that the defendants have obtained substantially the entire business enjoyed by the complainant some six months ago.
The complainant alleges that he is the owner of these patent rights, but no…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Silver & Co. v. J. P. Eustis Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1904
- Standard Roller Bearing Co. v. Hess-Bright Mfg. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern Pennsylvania · 1906
3Cited by2 opinions
- Meyers v. SkinnerU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Eastern New York · 1910
- Crown Cork & Seal Co. of Baltimore City v. New York Specialty Co.District Court, E.D. New York · 1913