Legal Opinion

Heineke v. Chicago Railways Co.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1917No. 11031PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Writ of Error to the Appellate Court for the First District;—heard in that court on appeal from the Circuit Court of Cook county; the Hon. Richard S. Tuthill, Judge, presiding.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Duncan

Defendant in error, Katherine M. Heineke, recovered a judgment of $2500 in the circuit court of Cook county against plaintiff in error for personal injuries received by her while a passenger in one of its street railway cars in the city of Chicago. The negligence charged in the first count of the declaration is that plaintiff in error permitted the aisle of the car to be and remain obstructed with a traveling bag or suitcase, and the defendant in error, by reason thereof, stumbled against and fell over said traveling bag and was injured. The second count charged that the plaintiff in error…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Schlauder v. Chicago & Southern Traction Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1911
  2. Fellows-Kimbrough v. Chicago City Railway Co.Illinois Supreme Court · 1916
  3. Kantner v. Philadelphia & Reading Railway Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1912
  4. Chicago City Railway Co. v. MorseIllinois Supreme Court · 1902

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Davis v. South Side Elevated RailroadIllinois Supreme Court · 1920
  2. Ploesser v. Burlington Rapid Transit Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1959
  3. Lazarus v. FrielAppellate Court of Illinois · 1947
  4. Barretta v. Chicago Railways Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1919
  5. Schachner v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1932

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API