Legal Opinion

United States v. Berger

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 8, 1945No. 10981PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENMAN, Circuit Judge.

This is upon a motion to reverse a judgment dismissing appellants’ complaint. The appeal has been perfected and both parties are within the jurisdiction of the court. A notice of motion with an accompanying copy of the motion and a brief in support thereof was served upon appellees more than six weeks before the date of the hearing, of which latter date the appellees were duly notified. Appellees failed to appear at the hearing and the motion was submitted without argument on appellants’ brief and the transcript of the record.

The complaint sets forth two causes of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Seago v. New York Central RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Womble v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1944
  4. Ex parte United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  5. Magnolia Petroleum Co. v. HullSupreme Court of the United States · 1941

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Henry J. Ernst v. Secretary of the Interior, Solicitor, Department of the Interior, and Roy N. MikelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
  2. United States v. BergerDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1946
  3. United States v. BergerDistrict Court, D. Alaska · 1945

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API