Bunker (Brandon) v. State

First, appellant argues that counsel was ineffective for failing to fully explain to appellant the guilty plea agreement as well as a new stipulation entered into at the sentencing hearing that resulted in appellant being sentenced to a much larger sentence than that set forth in the guilty plea agreement. Appellant failed to demonstrate deficiency or prejudice. Appellant made only a bare claim that counsel did not explain the guilty plea agreement; appellant did not state what it is that he did not understand. Further, appellant does not cite to anything to support his claim that the parties…