Legal Opinion

State v. Pultz

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1996No. 94-2806PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJanine P. Geske, J.

Petitioner Dale Pultz (Pultz) seeks review of a court of appeals decision affirming a remedial contempt order of the circuit court for Milwaukee County, Judge Robert W. Landry. The circuit court found Pultz in contempt for his violation of a permanent injunction enjoining him and others from engaging in particular activities at Milwaukee medical clinics. The questions presented are these: was the circuit court constitutionally required to inform the defendant that, if indigent, he had a right to appointed counsel at public expense in this remedial contempt proceeding brought by the State of…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Gagnon v. ScarpelliSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  5. Lassiter v. Department of Social Servs. of Durham Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1981

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Ex Parte GonzalesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1997
  2. State v. EricksonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  3. Pasqua v. CouncilSupreme Court of New Jersey · 2006
  4. State v. WidemanWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  5. Peters-Riemers v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2003

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API