Legal Opinion

Rexford Realty Group, Inc. v. Scofield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 10, 1980PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs. Memorandum: It is well settled that in the absence of an agreement to the contrary, a real estate broker is deemed to have earned his commission when he produces a buyer who is ready, willing and able to purchase at the terms set by the seller (Lane—The Real Estate Dept. Store v Lawlet Corp., 28 NY2d 36, 42). The broker’s right to a commission is not dependent upon the performance of the realty contract or the receipt by the seller of the selling price unless such conditions are part of the brokerage agreement (Hecht v Meller, 23 NY2d 301, 305). In…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Lane — Real Estate Department Store, Inc. v. Lawlet Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1971
  2. Hecht v. MellerNew York Court of Appeals · 1968
  3. M. I. Bernett, Inc. v. BossertNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
  4. M. I. Bernett, Inc. v. BossertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Smyczynski v. GoesekeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API