Legal Opinion
David Conners v. United States
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided May 12, 1966No. 19642PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
2Per curiam 1
The Clerk is directed to file appellant’s pro se motion for release on personal recognizance pending appeal and on consideration whereof, it is
Ordered by the court that appellant’s aforesaid motion is denied.
3Per curiam 2
It is quite so that the District Court for reasons not shown on the record before us fixed bail in the amount of $2,-000, but when an application is made here for relief, important-duties devolve upon this court. This appellant has asked, pro se, to be released on his personal bond. His application has informed us that he has refused “to cooperate with the D. C. Bond Project.” He…
4Cases cited1 opinion
- Walter R. Christian v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1965
5Cited by5 opinions
- United States v. Thomas E. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972
- DeAngelis v. State of South CarolinaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 1971
- United States v. MartoneDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 1968
- David Conners v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- United States v. Thomas E. StanleyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1972