People v. Hill
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1DissentGesmer, J.
Identification is a necessity for navigating daily life in contemporary society. Accordingly, I would find that the police officers’ retention of defendant’s identification while they undertook an investigation was a significant limitation on his freedom, and thus elevated their encounter with defendant to a seizure. Since the People did not argue that the officers’ actions were justified by a reasonable suspicion of criminal conduct, I would grant defendant’s motion to suppress the crack cocaine recovered from him, reverse his conviction, and dismiss the indictment.
*632BACKGROUND
Defendant was…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- Florida v. BostickSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- California v. Hodari D.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- People v. De BourNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
- People v. HollmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
- People v. HowardNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.