Legal Opinion
Pazo v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided December 20, 1996No. 96-0717PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
684 So.2d 898 (1996)
Raymond PAZO, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 96-0717.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
December 20, 1996.
James B. Gibson, Public Defender, and Dee R. Ball, Assistant Public Defender, Daytona Beach, for Appellant.
Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Michael D. Crotty, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach, for Appellee.
ANTOON, Judge.
The defendant appeals his sentence arguing that the trial court improperly directed him to pay investigative costs. We affirm the sentence but vacate that portion of the trial court's order…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Clinger v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1988
- Gant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
- Golden v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Burdo v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
- Samuels v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Bisson v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Walker v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Williams v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Wines v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997
- Davis v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997