Legal Opinion
Ex Parte Venegas
Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)
Decided August 4, 2003No. 04-03-00071-CRPublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by:
KAREN ANGELINI, Justice.
Miguel Angel Venegas complains that the trial court abused its discretion in denying his motion for bond pursuant to article 17.151 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure and in denying his motion to reduce his bond pursuant to article 17.15. Because Venegas has the right to be released on personal recognizance or reduced bond pursuant to article 17.151, we reverse and remand.
Background
Venegas is accused of committing murder and theft on January 18, 1991. Having been born on November 21, 1974, Venegas was sixteen years old at the time of the offense.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Jones v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1991
- Pate v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
- Ex Parte Rowe v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1993
- Ex Parte McNeil, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1989
- Moreno v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Ex Parte CastellanoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2010
- Clarissa De La Paz v. the State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District2024
- David Lee Jarman v. State of Texas, Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland)2004
- Ex Parte Abel Montes, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2021
- Ex Parte Damon Boyd, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.