Legal Opinion

In the Matter of J.O.J.

Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama

Decided April 18, 2003No. 2020107 and 2020108PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CRAWLEY, Judge.

J.O.J., Sr. (“the biological father”), and R.R. (“the mother”) had a five-year relationship; a child, J.O.J., Jr., was born of that relationship on June 14, 1994. Al*1282though J.O.J. was named after his biological father, no father was listed on the birth certificate. The mother and the biological father resided together with the child for approximately five years; after that time, from what we can discern from the record, the child continued to reside with the biological father.

The biological father received public assistance from the State of Alabama, and, on September 26, 2000,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Ex Parte PresseSupreme Court of Alabama · 1989
  2. B.T.D. v. T.L.C.H.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 1991
  3. W.R.C. v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 1995

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. J.O.J., Sr. v. R.R.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2004
  2. T.C. v. Mac.M.Court of Civil Appeals of Alabama · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API