Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

People v. Carlson

Criminal Court of the City of New York

Decided December 14, 1999PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Suzanne M. Mondo, J.

The defendant is charged with aggravated harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.30 [3]); harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [1]); and menacing in the third degree (Penal Law § 120.15).1 Defendant now moves to dismiss the charges of aggravated harassment, harassment and menacing for facial insufficiency.2

The information alleges the following: “Deponent states that deponent is informed by informant Jason Bell, an African-American male * * * that informant (i) heard the defendant say to informant ‘HOW FUCKED UP AMERICA IS BECAUSE…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. People v. GloverNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
  2. People v. DietzeNew York Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. People v. PeckAppellate Court of Illinois · 1994
  4. State v. KellerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  5. In re Ramon M.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. JacksonCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2008
  2. Holley v. COUNTY OF ORANGE, NYDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2009
  3. People v. CruzAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016
  4. People v. SimmonsCriminal Court of the City of New York · 2013
  5. People v. Cruz (Christopher)Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 2016

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API