Legal Opinion

Martin v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided February 14, 2001No. 4D99-3279PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

We affirm appellant’s conviction but remand for resentencing as appellant’s sentences were imposed pursuant to both the Habitual Violent Felony Offender statute and the Prison Releasee Reoffender stat*462ute. On remand, the trial court should sentence him only under the Prison Releasee Reoffender statute. See Grant v. State, 770 So.2d 655 (Fla.2000); Yehowshua v. State, 773 So.2d 654 (Fla. 4th DCA 2000).

AFFIRMED in part, REVERSED in part and REMANDED.

FARMER, KLEIN and TAYLOR, JJ, concur.

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grant v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 2000
  2. Yehowshua v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2000

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Campbell v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2001