Surrette v. Surrette

EAGLES, Judge.

Plaintiff brings forward several assignments of error. After careful review of the record and briefs, we affirm.

I

Plaintiff first contends that the trial court abused its discretion in calculating the value of defendant’s DuPont pension plan and in valuing the marital portion of the plan. We disagree.

The trial court found that if defendant retired without prejudice on the date of separation, defendant could choose between two alternatives to begin receiving the monthly benefits under his pension. Under the first alternative, defendant would receive $206 per month for the…